‘Sunday Lovers’ – The Roger Moore and Gene Wilder flop

Released in 1980 and featuring two leading men at the peak of their powers – with Roger Moore being the current James Bond and Gene Wilder arguably still in the prime of his career – this little-known film somehow ended up flopping heavily at the box office before vanishing without a trace.

‘Sunday Lovers’ was co-produced internationally, and is best described as an anthology of four separate romantic comedies, with the episodes set in various locations: – England, Paris, Los Angeles and Rome. Because the film was structured this way, Roger Moore and Gene Wilder did not share any screen time together – which may have impacted negatively upon the movie; perhaps not helped by a slightly misleading poster.

Overall, the film was savaged by critics, with a couple of the episodes in particular coming under heavy fire. With this in mind, the best way to explore ‘Sunday Lovers’ would be to separate it into the four different stories, beginning with the opening chapter starring Roger Moore.

‘An Englishman’s Home’ features Moore as a chauffeur named Harry, who would assume the role of his aristocrat employer whenever he was out of town as a pretense to seduce young and impressionable air hostesses. Actually, impersonating his employer would be a more accurate description. Aided by his work colleague Parker – a complicit butler played by Denholm Elliott – Harry convinces an American stewardess named Donna back to ‘his’ castle for a little romance, only for the weekend to be thrown into disarray by an unexpected visitor.

Thanks to Roger Moore’s performance as Roger Moore, this story – despite its lecherous premise – can be easily passed off as lightweight and harmless – and is easily the best of the four episodes.

The film then moves on to the second story – ‘The French Method’ starring Italian actor Lino Ventura as a Parisian businessman who agrees to hook up his secretary with an American client in order to close an important deal.

Honestly, the misogynistic themes throughout this episode were too heavy – even for me – with an all-too-willing young woman adding to the overall discomfort. Despite the performances being solid and the story ending with the main character redeeming himself, the distinct lack of humour here – in contrast to the previous chapter – leaves it well short of a pass mark.

The third story is titled ‘Skippy’ and was written and directed by Gene Wilder, who also plays the titular character – a mentally-troubled middle-aged man named Skippy.

I actually watched this episode twice, and still can’t quite get a read on it. This is a strange one, for out of the four chapters featured in ‘Sunday Lovers’, I suppose this would be the closest to a love story, and yet so much of this tale is ambiguous and open to interpretation. My suspicion is that Gene Wilder wrote this as a feature-length screenplay, and having offered it up to this project needed to cut it down dramatically into a twenty-minute piece. As a result, I sense there is a lot of exposition missing.

The story itself centres on Skippy – a man aged in his forties who has checked himself into a mental health facility – and his romantic escapades with a much younger woman named Laurie (played by Kathleen Quinlan) during a weekend release from the hospital. There are some trademark Wilder moments, such as his crazy dancing to Bee Gees songs, but seeing him naked throughout extended love scenes was definitely not on my bingo card. This story really was a mixed bag!

I enjoyed ‘Skippy’ to a degree, as there was just enough depth to get me invested in the characters; helped along by the madcap antics of Wilder, but brought down a peg or two by the excessive nudity. However, most reviewers and online commentators rate this story as a dumpster fire, with many saying it is the worst episode out of the four, but I did not quite see it that way.

The fourth and final chapter is titled ‘Armando’s Notebook’ and stars Ugo Tognazzi, who plays an Italian man named Armando who discovers an old notebook containing the telephone numbers of his former girlfriends. As his wife is away for the weekend, a bored Armando begins calling the names listed in the book, and of course – hi-jinks ensue!

Setting aside the willingness of the main character to cheat on his wife so easily, this story is really nothing more than a typical Italian romantic comedy/romp. Tognazzi’s performance is serviceable and there are a number of funny scenes; most notably a bizarre encounter with a woman possessing supernatural powers.

I would give this episode a pass mark, as it is quite entertaining yet mindless on so many levels.

Overall, ‘Sunday Lovers’ is a watchable film but will not have aged well with most modern audiences. Having Roger Moore and Gene Wilder attached to this project is what initially piqued my interest, and their respective stories are definitely worth watching. I maintain that Moore’s ‘An Englishman’s Home’ is the better of the four episodes, with Wilder’s ‘Skippy’ coming in second place. The Italian romp ‘Armando’s Notebook’ is next best – thanks to its comedic tones – with the Parisian tale ‘The French Method’ being the least enjoyable chapter.

‘Sunday Lovers’ or ‘Les Seducteurs’ used to be almost impossible to find, but fortunately – thanks to the wonders of the internet – the entire film can now be watched on YouTube.

I have added a link below to Don Alex’s YouTube Channel where not only can you watch the movie, but you can read some of the host’s insightful comments about the film – some of which differ from my own opinions. Regardless, if you are a fan of Roger Moore or Gene Wilder – or both – then I highly recommend you check out the film, even if you only watch their particular segments.

Again, the link is below – courtesy of Don Alex on YouTube.

Screenshots courtesy of Cinema International Corporation, United Artists and MGM.

I was too harsh on John De Hart

A couple of years ago, I wrote a scathing (but accurate) article about the 1993 B-Movie ‘Champagne and Bullets’ – starring the amazing John De Hart.

For those not aware of this brilliant film, ‘Champagne and Bullets’ is an action/romance/revenge flick that was fully funded by Mr De Hart out of his own pocket. Not only was John the director, but he cast himself as the main star, and also sang most of the songs on the soundtrack. Needless to say, the end product was a masterpiece of poor cinema, and is regarded by fans of bad movies to be one of the all-time greats – with Wikipedia describing De Hart’s performance as “amateur and inexplicable.”

Anyway, I’m not sure what the reasons are, but my John De Hart write-up from 2023 has seen an increase in views over the past few days. With this in mind, perhaps it is time to share a few more thoughts about this one-time action star; focusing more on the man himself and being a little ‘nicer’ this time around.

So, let’s break down the indomitable screen presence of John De Hart – action star, romantic leading man and overall legend – beginning with how smooth this guy is with the ladies.

Romance is clearly one of John’s strongest suits, and he is well-known for punching above his weight. De Hart always follows the same successful routine; kicking things off with a classy dinner – as seen in the photo above – before moving on to more ‘comfortable surroundings.’

It’s all too easy for a man of such talents…

But even a superstar like John De Hart needs a little help sometimes – and it’s great to have a friend close by to hold your champagne flute just as things start to heat up!

I love your work, John – but that extra hand is creepy!

John De Hart is also a certified fashion icon, and throughout ‘Champagne and Bullets’ he graces our screens with some remarkable outfits. It’s best to simply let the pictures below do the talking, but I must say that his black leather costume – as seen in the second photo – is out of this world!

But perhaps the most impressive combination John wears in the movie would be his white and navy blue-striped wedding tracksuit.

Despite his many talents, John De Hart is first and foremost an action man – whether it be fighting the forces of evil or taking to the stage to perform his signature hit song – ‘The Shimmy Slide.’ This man can do it all – hot damn!

When it comes to eliminating the villains, De Hart has a ‘particular set of skills’ at his disposal to get the job done. Be it a crossbow, a gun, or simply his lethal martial arts powers – John De Hart excels in all disciplines and the bad guys should know better than to mess with him!

I will finish off this glowing tribute to one of Hollywood’s quiet achievers by touching on his remarkable acting ability. With a range on par with Pacino or Brando, John De Hart delivers a broad spectrum of emotions – and has been known to recite Shakespeare so flawlessly that even Sir Laurence Olivier would feel belittled by such raw power.

If you haven’t seen ‘Champagne and Bullets’ – which sadly turned out to be the only film John De Hart ever made* – then I strongly recommend that you do. It’s bad – really bad – yet has a magnetic appeal that makes it almost impossible to stop watching. De Hart himself is front-and-centre throughout most of this insanity, yet strangely enough comes across as a likeable guy who just seems to be ‘having a go’ – an attribute that we Aussies appreciate.

I happened to find the full movie on YouTube that has all the nudity blurred out, and trust me – that’s not a bad thing. I have added the link below, courtesy of DDF: Movie Day – but as it is age restricted, you might have to sign in to view it.

*Note: John De Hart made a cameo appearance in the 2006 film ‘The Champagne Gang.’

‘Empire of the Dark’ is pure B-Grade genius!

An out-of-shape middle-aged leading man takes on sword-wielding Satanic priests, demons, gun-toting villains and more in this 1991 horror/action thriller!

Written, directed by and starring Steve Barkett (who sadly passed away in 2023), this feature has all the hallmarks of a vanity project – re Neil Breen or John De Hart – but turns out to be a pretty solid flick. One simply needs to see beyond the flaws of this ambitious low-budget film to be able to enjoy the spectacle that it truly is.

Barkett stars as Richard Flynn, who while working as a cop, enters through a portal into Hell to rescue his ex-girlfriend’s baby son before he is sacrificed by devil worshippers. The film then skips twenty years to when Flynn is now a private eye, and is forced to battle the evil acolytes of Satan once again!

Barkett clearly considers himself to be an action man, and his screenplay and direction suggests as much, as he is constantly killing bad guys and romancing women way out of his league. However, he delivers a lot of tongue-in-cheek comments and one-liners, hinting that he is aware of his physical shortcomings, and decides to run with it anyway. What this does is bring a lot of charm and character to the film, and you end up really liking the guy and cheering him on.

The soundtrack to this movie – from composer John Morgan – is quite good, from the opening theme to the catchy incidental music featured throughout the film. I have watched bigger – and supposedly better – productions whose musical scores were nowhere near as memorable as this effort.

The special effects were decent in places, especially the modelling of the hellish caves and wooden bridges and platforms within the underground labyrinth. However, the stop-start animation that brought the main demon to life was a bit ‘how ya going’, as we say in Australia. Perhaps ‘questionable’ might be a more widely-recognised term, but you can appreciate what the film-makers were trying to do.

As far as action goes, ‘Empire of the Dark’ delivers the goods. There is an endless supply of hooded evil disciples trying to kill our hero, who fights them all off with either a gun or a sword, while less-than-gracefully executing moves that are awkward and sluggish yet somehow appear on screen as poetry in slow-motion. It’s comedy through and through, and Steve Barkett is right on point here; really hamming things up and breaking the fourth wall on at least one occasion.

‘Empire of the Dark’ has a 4.8 rating out of 10 at IMDB, and I think this is just about right. This is not a great movie, especially with the poor acting and ridiculous plot, but nor is it a complete dud. This film is watchable and quite entertaining, and as mentioned earlier it has a certain charm – or affability – that gets it across the line.

It’s a solid 3 out of 5 from me. Yes, it’s a ‘bad’ movie but it’s one you can laugh along with. I also think it’s a shame we didn’t see Steve Barkett in more mainstream movies over the years.

There was an episode of ‘So Bad It’s Good’ on YouTube a few years back, where they reviewed this movie and seemingly enjoyed it as well. It’s worth watching, so I’ve added the link below.

But if you are feeling a little more adventurous, the entire film is also available on YouTube. I’m not sure if the link will work due to age restrictions, but it is provided below – courtesy of Jacohsc Films YouTube Channel.

Screenshots courtesy of the Nautilus Film Company.

Champagne and Bullets – the greatest vanity project ever?

In the early 1990’s, middle-aged John De Hart was convinced that he possessed all the qualities needed to become a Hollywood leading man. According to him, not only did he have the physique of an Adonis, but could recite Shakespeare as well as sing and dance on par with any West End or Broadway performer. To round out the entire package, De Hart believed he was a comedian of the highest calibre, trend-setting fashion icon and a sex symbol second to none.

The only way John De Hart could harness all his powers and announce himself to the world was to produce, direct and star in his own movie. If this wasn’t enough, he sang all the musical numbers throughout the film and I believe wrote every song.

When none of the major distributors picked up ‘Champagne and Bullets’, De Hart went back to the drawing board and made a few changes. As far as I can tell, some of the sound editing was improved and the gratuitous sex scenes shortened (a little). In a major shift, the opening credits were swapped around with different music and footage. De Hart’s songs, including the entire ‘Shimmy Slide’ performance survived the cut as did his jokes.

This resulted in the film’s re-release under the title ‘Road to Revenge’.

De Hart was passed over again, but came back stronger with a new-look version of his masterpiece. I’m not sure what changes were made third time around, only that the film was now called ‘GetEven’ – one word.

Sadly, ‘Champagne and Bullets’/’Road to Revenge’/’GetEven’ was the only film John De Hart ever made.

You only need to digest a handful of scenes from this movie to understand the dangers of pursuing a vanity project of this size. John De Hart could not act, nor could he sing and dance. He was a fifty year old man with zero sex appeal and a wooden personality. Yet because De Hart was writing the cheques and calling the shots, chances are no one informed the boss of his shortcomings during the film’s production.

Almost thirty years on, ‘Champagne and Bullets’ (or whatever you wish to call it) is still regarded as one of the worst movies ever made. To comprehend just how bad it is, there was a recent review by Jason Brant on his awesome YouTube channel which is worth checking out. Hit the link below.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UvQo_AeW3gk

All cover images courtesy of Monarch Productions.